Yep, I know about the "Between the ribs" approach. And that was what I was wondering if I'd be a candidate for (and asked him about) in addition to the smaller (like 4 inch or so I think) sternotomy approach. He's on some committee or something that is continually looking at those options. And he said if I really, really wanted it, he'd talk to me more about it. But as he described the pros and cons (most importantly, more time on heart/lung machine), I just felt - ah, what the heck - at least for a guy, the sternotomy scar isn't THAT bad, and if it makes it easier on the surgeon - I'm all for him being comfortable while he's working! And in my case, it might have been good he had extra room - he said he had a heck of a time getting my old valve out cause it was so calcified. I suspect it's still just a little too "experimental" for some of the old-timer surgeons. Although mine seems pretty progressive, he still preferred his modified traditional approach (slightly less long scar than 'normal' and glue instead of stiches / staples). But glad yours worked out for ya! That's awsome - you got the best of both worlds - a successful surgery, and a smaller scar! Maybe you should advertise that a little more (I didn't know you'd had minimally invasive) just in case others aren't aware it's a possibility.
Umm don't know if I can do that. hehe, but in all seriousness, be moderate in your consumption. Last thing you want is to eat a hole in your stomach.
