T
thecman321
Hi everyone, I have been lurking on the site but haven't posted in a while, but now I need the help and support this site provided to me almost 2 years ago.
Here is the scoop
My now 33 year old wife has a condition called Shone's which has a combination of congenital anomalies, 1. coarctation of the aorta, repaired at age five. 2. sub arotic stenosis and defective aortic valve which was repaired at age ten and recently replaced in Jan 2005 with mechanical valve AND lastly 3. what the literature refers as a "parachute" mitral valve.
In Jan 2005 the surgeon said the mitral valve was abnormal but functioning well. Recovered and did well from surgery.
TODAY, Aug 3 TEE results,,,,,less than promising,, my wife said that the cardio doing the procedure didnt say much other than stating the leakage was alot worse than they thought and eluded to valve replacement in the near future. We are still shell shocked as i write this, i don't know what i am feeling right now other that the typical WHY ME WHY US,,,,, AGAIN ?????????? Havent we been through enough????????? !!!!!!!!!!!!
My questions are if the surgeon saw a defective mitral valve should a 2 valve replacement surgery been done,,,, is there such a thing,, are 2 valves ever replaced at the same time??
How bad does a mitral valve leak need to be before surgery is warrented? Any specific numers?
Any other bi valvers out there to chime in?
What are the risks of surgery at this point, how is mitral after mechanical aortic valve replacement different than the original surgery?
What questions should we bring in to the cardiologist in 2 weeks?
Thanks
C
Here is the scoop
My now 33 year old wife has a condition called Shone's which has a combination of congenital anomalies, 1. coarctation of the aorta, repaired at age five. 2. sub arotic stenosis and defective aortic valve which was repaired at age ten and recently replaced in Jan 2005 with mechanical valve AND lastly 3. what the literature refers as a "parachute" mitral valve.
In Jan 2005 the surgeon said the mitral valve was abnormal but functioning well. Recovered and did well from surgery.
TODAY, Aug 3 TEE results,,,,,less than promising,, my wife said that the cardio doing the procedure didnt say much other than stating the leakage was alot worse than they thought and eluded to valve replacement in the near future. We are still shell shocked as i write this, i don't know what i am feeling right now other that the typical WHY ME WHY US,,,,, AGAIN ?????????? Havent we been through enough????????? !!!!!!!!!!!!
My questions are if the surgeon saw a defective mitral valve should a 2 valve replacement surgery been done,,,, is there such a thing,, are 2 valves ever replaced at the same time??
How bad does a mitral valve leak need to be before surgery is warrented? Any specific numers?
Any other bi valvers out there to chime in?
What are the risks of surgery at this point, how is mitral after mechanical aortic valve replacement different than the original surgery?
What questions should we bring in to the cardiologist in 2 weeks?
Thanks
C