cbdheartman
Well-known member
Well, I am booked for surgery at either CC or Hopkins later this summer. My head and gut say to do it. And yet I still am not totally settled on doing the surgery. I know some on here must be annoyed with me. Sorry.
The thing I am having trouble understanding and digesting is why so many cardio-thoracic surgeons are telling me to wait. What, if anything, do they know that I don't? For instance, I spoke to a family friend who is a busy cardio-thoracic surgeon in the Midwest. He greatly respects Duke Cameron and he said if Duke Cameron is saying wait, he'd wait. (He also said that if I were his patient he'd have me wait until 5.5 cm. He's had patients who have just sat at 5.1 or 5.2 cm for 15 years.) He said that he thought there was no problem with running, biking, golfing, etc. He said, "You probably could go out and run a marathon," but he did tell me to avoid heavy lifting and to avoid say doing a sprint. I was hearing and thinking: "This seems nuts! Why would I run and exercise like that and put strain on my heart." He said the real worry is the sharp and sudden increase in blood pressure and that running doesn't do that to the heart.
Then you hear the story of bugchucker and how his cardio changed his mind over a two hour period concerning his 4.7 cm aneurysm and you wonder what the heck he saw that the guys talking to me don't see.
I guess it is good that each surgeon has said he'd do the surgery, but I still wish I were getting their seal of approval. It would make it easier.
The proof is probably in the pudding of anxiety that you folks have gotten just a small taste of. Can I really get closure by choosing not to do the surgery? I am not really scared of the surgery. I am having anxiety dreams about a variety of things because of this hanging over me.
Am I foolish to get operated on when I am 31 years old and my aneurysm is "only" in the high 4s? Or am I foolish to not get this done? (BTW, I got the earliest date I could at Hopkins and one of the earliest dates I could at CC so my talking about it on here isn't putting off the surgery. It is dealing with whether I go through with the surgery or call it off.) Now I think the answer is in what I am saying here, but I just keep wondering if I am missing something.
Are these doctors making these recommendations on more than just numbers but on experience? By this I mean that they know that the "stats" show I have a 3% annual risk of dissection, but by experience they believe someone younger and healthier and taller really doesn't have much risk at all? Have they had good experience telling people to wait? (BTW Ross did you ever talk to your doctors who told you to wait; what did they say?) Do we have lots of stories of 31 year old dissecting or is a 4.9cm aortic root in a 31 year old more durable than a 4.9 cm one in a 55 year old?
Again, I ask these questions because I am really wrestling with things here. Maybe I am just looking for a little more help to push me all the way to the final decision.
I know that the future is unknowable and there are risks either way, but I really am struggling here.
Thanks in advance!
CBD
The thing I am having trouble understanding and digesting is why so many cardio-thoracic surgeons are telling me to wait. What, if anything, do they know that I don't? For instance, I spoke to a family friend who is a busy cardio-thoracic surgeon in the Midwest. He greatly respects Duke Cameron and he said if Duke Cameron is saying wait, he'd wait. (He also said that if I were his patient he'd have me wait until 5.5 cm. He's had patients who have just sat at 5.1 or 5.2 cm for 15 years.) He said that he thought there was no problem with running, biking, golfing, etc. He said, "You probably could go out and run a marathon," but he did tell me to avoid heavy lifting and to avoid say doing a sprint. I was hearing and thinking: "This seems nuts! Why would I run and exercise like that and put strain on my heart." He said the real worry is the sharp and sudden increase in blood pressure and that running doesn't do that to the heart.
Then you hear the story of bugchucker and how his cardio changed his mind over a two hour period concerning his 4.7 cm aneurysm and you wonder what the heck he saw that the guys talking to me don't see.
I guess it is good that each surgeon has said he'd do the surgery, but I still wish I were getting their seal of approval. It would make it easier.
The proof is probably in the pudding of anxiety that you folks have gotten just a small taste of. Can I really get closure by choosing not to do the surgery? I am not really scared of the surgery. I am having anxiety dreams about a variety of things because of this hanging over me.
Am I foolish to get operated on when I am 31 years old and my aneurysm is "only" in the high 4s? Or am I foolish to not get this done? (BTW, I got the earliest date I could at Hopkins and one of the earliest dates I could at CC so my talking about it on here isn't putting off the surgery. It is dealing with whether I go through with the surgery or call it off.) Now I think the answer is in what I am saying here, but I just keep wondering if I am missing something.
Are these doctors making these recommendations on more than just numbers but on experience? By this I mean that they know that the "stats" show I have a 3% annual risk of dissection, but by experience they believe someone younger and healthier and taller really doesn't have much risk at all? Have they had good experience telling people to wait? (BTW Ross did you ever talk to your doctors who told you to wait; what did they say?) Do we have lots of stories of 31 year old dissecting or is a 4.9cm aortic root in a 31 year old more durable than a 4.9 cm one in a 55 year old?
Again, I ask these questions because I am really wrestling with things here. Maybe I am just looking for a little more help to push me all the way to the final decision.
I know that the future is unknowable and there are risks either way, but I really am struggling here.
Thanks in advance!
CBD