jeffp
Well-known member
My cardiologist still thinks I'm imagining the cognitive changes pre vs. post surgery. I know we've discussed it here off and on but I came across this in one of my ramblings around the net. (I spend too much time on the computer! ) It's from the New England Journal of Medicine, Feb 8, 2001, Vol 344, #6, p 451-2. (Sorry, no open web link, I have a PDF though.) It studied CABG procedures but we valvers went though a whole lot more manipulation, and I would think more at risk.
Quote snips: "...Long-term cognitive changes after CABG have received less attention, despite common reports by patients that they are "just not the same" after surgery. The cognitive changes are often subtle, involving problems with following directions, mental arithmetic, and planning complex actions. Family members or colleagues may also notice that a patient is more short-tempered, is less able to withstand frustration, and has wider mood swings.....At the time of discharge, they found a high incidence of decline (53 percent) from presurgical base-line performance, which decreased to 36 percent at six weeks and 24 percent at six months. Surprisingly, at five years of follow-up, 42 percent of patients were performing below their base-line levels.... These changes may well be reversible. But superimposed on these short-term changes, more slowly evolving or delayed effects may occur, perhaps as a result of an initial injury from a combination of hypoperfusion and microemboli..."
Quote snips: "...Long-term cognitive changes after CABG have received less attention, despite common reports by patients that they are "just not the same" after surgery. The cognitive changes are often subtle, involving problems with following directions, mental arithmetic, and planning complex actions. Family members or colleagues may also notice that a patient is more short-tempered, is less able to withstand frustration, and has wider mood swings.....At the time of discharge, they found a high incidence of decline (53 percent) from presurgical base-line performance, which decreased to 36 percent at six weeks and 24 percent at six months. Surprisingly, at five years of follow-up, 42 percent of patients were performing below their base-line levels.... These changes may well be reversible. But superimposed on these short-term changes, more slowly evolving or delayed effects may occur, perhaps as a result of an initial injury from a combination of hypoperfusion and microemboli..."