Christina L
Well-known member
I have been rarely posting here as of late, because I was beginning to get very depressed and upset that my mitral valve repair may be one of the few that doesn't go the distance - it is hard to read the glowing reports that others with mitral valve repair have gotten in the last several months from their respective doctors - yes, I am rather envious and I admit it - I wish everyone well, of course, but I am green with envy. I also seem to get no answers to my questions these days. VR.com has not seemed like a place where one can get answers to "heart" questions anymore (at least it seems that way to me).
I am posting this thread today because I just received a letter from Dr. Cosgrove in Cleveland (or should I say his assistant, Jeanne) regarding my inquiries about my newly diagnosed mitral stenosis three years out from mitral valve repair.
The letter said little, if anything, that helps me out, only that Dr. Cosgrove said to tell me that "no one knows the path that valvular disease will take" and that he will be glad to read my echo tape if I want to send it to him (right now my echo tape is being re-read by my former cardiologist and I am anxiously awaiting his diagnosis). Also the letter said that my mitral valve gradient was 6.0 on 11/11/03 and it is now 8 (as of January 2007). My mitral valve area is 1.35.
They read my echo in January as "mild mitral stenosis" but from my reading on the web, this seems to be "moderate" mitral stenosis.
My new cardio got a bit upset when I questioned his diagnosis of "mild" - he told me in January that it needs to be watched yearly, BUT he was sure my repair would last a good 20 years.
I am rather miffed - I feel that Dr. Cosgrove did a repair when he shouldn't have. The letter also said there was no measurement done of my mitral valve area right after surgery and on discharge. I don't understand that one at all! Why in the world wouldn't a surgeon do a measurement of the mitral valve area after he does a repair???
Can a person live with mitral stenosis indefinitely, especially from a repair? I have read a few other people here on the board who have mitral stenosis after repair - some have been told what I have - nothing to worry about - the stenosis is from the ring around your annulus - your repair will last 20 years - others say they are going to need replacement eventually because of the stenosis.
Thanks for any wisdom on this matter you can give me.
One more thing - my mitral valve area was also 1.35 in November of 2005, so the stenosis doesn't seem to have gotten worse in over a year's time.
Christina L
I am posting this thread today because I just received a letter from Dr. Cosgrove in Cleveland (or should I say his assistant, Jeanne) regarding my inquiries about my newly diagnosed mitral stenosis three years out from mitral valve repair.
The letter said little, if anything, that helps me out, only that Dr. Cosgrove said to tell me that "no one knows the path that valvular disease will take" and that he will be glad to read my echo tape if I want to send it to him (right now my echo tape is being re-read by my former cardiologist and I am anxiously awaiting his diagnosis). Also the letter said that my mitral valve gradient was 6.0 on 11/11/03 and it is now 8 (as of January 2007). My mitral valve area is 1.35.
They read my echo in January as "mild mitral stenosis" but from my reading on the web, this seems to be "moderate" mitral stenosis.
My new cardio got a bit upset when I questioned his diagnosis of "mild" - he told me in January that it needs to be watched yearly, BUT he was sure my repair would last a good 20 years.
I am rather miffed - I feel that Dr. Cosgrove did a repair when he shouldn't have. The letter also said there was no measurement done of my mitral valve area right after surgery and on discharge. I don't understand that one at all! Why in the world wouldn't a surgeon do a measurement of the mitral valve area after he does a repair???
Can a person live with mitral stenosis indefinitely, especially from a repair? I have read a few other people here on the board who have mitral stenosis after repair - some have been told what I have - nothing to worry about - the stenosis is from the ring around your annulus - your repair will last 20 years - others say they are going to need replacement eventually because of the stenosis.
Thanks for any wisdom on this matter you can give me.
One more thing - my mitral valve area was also 1.35 in November of 2005, so the stenosis doesn't seem to have gotten worse in over a year's time.
Christina L