Urgent Surgeon Choice

Valve Replacement Forums

Help Support Valve Replacement Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Magic8Ball

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2006
Messages
562
Location
Perth, West Australia.
Ok, this is going to be a long one so grab a coffee and read on, i need to make a decision in the next 24 hours and would appreciate feedback.....

I have the choice of two surgeons to fix my bicuspid aortic valve and aortic anurism of 5.6cm's, the following is a summary of both.

Surgeon 1 suggests fixing the valve and anurism as two separate units keeping my aortic root so the arteries don't need to be moved. The surgery would be done under cooling but NOT DHCA.

Surgeon 2 suggests doing a one unit bentalls procedure under DHCA.(deep hypothermic circulatory arrest)

Both Surgeons suggest the St Jude Valve.

Both Surgeons are lovely to talk to and seem very compitent.

Now i was initially taken aback because i thought all work on the aorta needed DHCA so was slightly unsure of surgeon 1, i was also a little unsure of keeping my aortic root but the reasoning behind it for surgeon 1 was if its ok don't mess with it as you can't control scar tissue....

Surgeon 2's reasoning behind full bentals is that i have a connective tissue dissorder so why keep anything in there that could go pear shaped in the future, he also says that without DHCA there is no way that all of the ascending aorta can be replaced and so you leave a little bit there that could start to dilate in the future also.

Surgeon 2 also says the full bentalls is a one hit surgery that should last a lifetime and is no more of a recovery period so 6-12 weeks ok and i should be absolutely normal after 12 months with no restrictions at all. He also says an inr of 2-2.5 would be ok for me. he also says doing the full bentals only adds minimal risk to the surgery although it is a more difficult procedure for the surgeon (wonder if this is why surgeon 1 did not suggest it), its still 98% success rate in his hands.

Just some background also, surgeon 1 was recommended by my cardio, surgeon 2 was recommended by a friend of a friend who has just had exactly the same surgery done by surgeon2 and was recommended to surgeon 2 by a highly placed person in the cardio thorasic arena as she has connections in those circles....

Surgeon 2 has done 34 bentalls and done 3 in the last 2 weeks, surgeon 1 never gave me figures on how many surgerys he had done but he had worked on severy aortic emergency disections over the weeks prior to me meeting and told me he was one of the few that published his results. None of this is really a consideration for me as i think they are both great surgeons.

Probably my only worry of surgeon 1 is that he goes on holidays for a week 10 days after my surgery so if something goes weird i'd be getting his surgical cover and not him...

I have to choose between them in the next 24 hours.

I'm leaning towards surgeon 2 and his get it all in one shot approach, i feel that i understand his unwillingness to keep my aortic root and i think i'm happier with the DHCA approach even though it has a slightly higher risk associated with it due to the brain being on pause for 15 minutes or so.....

Although surgeon 2 is slightly less charismatic i spend nearly an hour in surgeon 2's rooms talking through my conditions, the risk, the options and i never felt rushed or hurried in any way. He injected humour in the right places and i was very happy with him, plus he was on time. Surgeon 1 was late for my appointment and i felt rushed, we were only in there for 20 minutes or so.

Whadaya think people? :rolleyes: yeh i know hard one to answer but has anyone with my condition gone/not gone with a full bentalls for any reason? also what are everyones thoughts on DHCA...all my reading up until seeing surgeon 1 was that it was the way to go as you didn't need to clamp etc....

Anyway i'll stop rambling....i realise i have probably answered my own question above....surgeon 2 is also a kids heart surgeon and has done heart flips on hearts less that an inch big and reattached arteries less than 1mm in diameter...

Yeh i know, surgeon 2 but you gotta ask..;)
 
I'll also vote for #2. For a lot of reasons. Frankly, after reading all of your post, I thought you were sold more on him anyway.

Marybeth
 
I'm with everyone else. Surgeon 2 sounds best to me.

It seems that surgeon 1 left several questions unanswered or not fully answered. I have the impression that you feel some guilt in rejecting him because he was recommended by your Cardiologist. What does your Cardiologist think of Surgeon 2? If your Cardiologist is offended by you choosing a different surgeon, find another Cardiologist.

Bottom Line: I like the idea of taking care of everything in one surgery and not having this 'knife' over your head waiting to fall should your aorta fail at some future date.

'AL Capshaw'
 
Definately #2 - I think you talked yourself into him as well;)
 
Magic8Ball said:
Probably my only worry of surgeon 1 is that he goes on holidays for a week 10 days after my surgery so if something goes weird i'd be getting his surgical cover and not him...

I agree with both you and everyone who has posted before me that surgeon #2 is probably the best choice. However, I wouldn't use the statement above as a deciding point. I saw my surgeon when I was loopy about six hours after my surgery, and that was it. I didn't even see him for my follow-up two weeks later. I remember calling about three weeks after surgery with a question, and the nurse uncerimoniously referred me to my Cardiologist. From posts I've read on this website, it sounds like most people have had similar experiences.

I was a little taken aback at the time, but I've come to a greater realization at this point. Though my surgery was a big deal TO ME, I was told that my surgeon often did 2-3 of the same or similar surgeries on any given day. Asking him to visit with every patient for about an hour pre-op, follow-up with post-op patients, and, oh yeah, actually do the surgeries, is way too much for a single person. There's nothing wrong with a little delagation here and there...
 
I wouldn't worry too much about your surgeon whomever you choose and his holiday timing. I saw my surgeon for 15 seconds ICU time...maybe that's a minute in real time and haven't seen him since. I remember a smile and the words "geometry and angles". That's it. :rolleyes: His Fellows visited me daily.
Best Wishes,
Debbi
 
SURGEON #1!!!........j/k! I would definitely go with surgeon #2. You have that gut feeling he is right and the right one and you should go with that.
 
Bentall's

Bentall's

For whatever it's worth, I had the full Bentall's Procedure (valve plus root) and no other option was mentioned. My aortic root was so enlarged and leakage was so severe, I don't think I had any other option. I am doing well and am very happy with the outcome. If you have this dual problem, having it all done, as your Surgeon No. 2 recommends, makes sense to me.

My surgeon is considered one of the most expert anywhere at doing this procedure. I remember seeing him once in my hospital room a few days after the surgery, and he was very cordial and encouraging -- but his associates were around a lot daily checking on me. After working their magic, surgeons have more important things to do -- namely, more surgeries -- than making the rounds of the rooms.

All best wishes as you go forward.....
 
You know the answer

You know the answer

Yes, you've answered your own question.

Having had a full Bentall's almost six months ago (with a great result), I'd also recommend Surgeon #2.

Best regards,

Kristine
 
I'll take what's behind door number two, Monty...

I agree with your reasoning. Do the thing. If you were to go with the first approach, you'd want the root resectioned or stabilized with dacron to avoid future problems, so it's not like it would go untouched anyway.

Best wishes,
 
Yep, #2. I don't like the idea of hanging on to something in the middle of something that's known to be bad on both ends. What's the point unless it's to avoid the delicate job of removing and reattaching the coronary arteries--does #1 find that daunting? I also think the DHCA difference is very significant--if they don't use DHCA I believe they generally clamp, and risk damaging, the remaining aorta. No thanks. Definitely #2 for me.
 
PJmomrunner said:
I also think the DHCA difference is very significant--if they don't use DHCA I believe they generally clamp, and risk damaging, the remaining aorta.

Yep, that was what i'd read up until meeting surgeon #1 and i think having surgeon #2 say 'use dhca to make sure we get all the bad tissue' was the biggest difference between the two.

I read that cesars sinyai? some website of a leading heart surgery place were using dhca for all heart work as it showed less trauma for other organs and better recovery etc etc.

I'm under no pressure to pick #1 or #2 and i could pontificate even more and go see a #3 as we have 3 good ones in perth but i thik the 'full works' under dhca with the possibility of nothing else left to bugger up works for me.

Well i guess i'll have a coffee (decaf :rolleyes: ) and make the call to switch camps...The second surgeon will operate on the 20th November rather than the 16th so whoever tracks these things could you please make a change.

Thanks again for your posts, kinda helps to have loads of little voices back you up when you are in situations like this.;)
 
All sorted now.

Going with #2 on the 20th November.

Just got to wait until then and not go bonkers as the date approaches.

But yes, much happier with DHCA and full bentalls than the alternative, lets hope it turns out to be an uneventful couple of months and i'm sitting on floor unwrapping christmas presents with the kids on the 25th December before going for a 4k walk....:p
 

Latest posts

Back
Top