Well, I had been sailing along blissfully in the waiting room - 6 months checkups which showed MVP - moderate to severe regurg with all heart measurements within normal ranges. Then I had my appendix out four weeks ago and wasn't happy with how long it took me to recover. It really knocked me out for a couple of weeks. So I went back to my cardio and asked him what he thought. He ordered another echo which came back moderate regurg and normal heart sizes. He said unless anything changed to come back and see him in April.
Because of VR.com and what I have read here I asked him if I could see a surgeon now rather than later. I said that I wanted to be sure I was happy with the surgeon and to talk things through earlier rather than later. He was surprised but agreeable and sent me off to have an angiogram first. So I had the angio on Monday. It showed very severe regurg and mildly dilated LA.
Which test is more accurate - have others had widely differing results between an echo and an angio?? I am seeing the surgeon tomorrow...
Because of VR.com and what I have read here I asked him if I could see a surgeon now rather than later. I said that I wanted to be sure I was happy with the surgeon and to talk things through earlier rather than later. He was surprised but agreeable and sent me off to have an angiogram first. So I had the angio on Monday. It showed very severe regurg and mildly dilated LA.
Which test is more accurate - have others had widely differing results between an echo and an angio?? I am seeing the surgeon tomorrow...