jeffp
Well-known member
At my most recent caridologist visit, he wanted to check the INR with a blood draw vs at INRatio (he's not to trusting of the home units). No problem as they were going to stick me for a bunch of other stuff too. Went to my PCP the next morning and he just got a new CoagCheck S for use in the office a few weeks ago ( he never knew they existed until I bitched about getting stuck every week for a while there and told him about my tribulations waiting for my home test unit). The nurse did the calibration and QC stuff just that morning and got reading of 6.3 (no change in my diet or meds, but did stop the exercise the past 4 days due to the weather). I went home and did a test on the INRatio and got 6.2 - close enough to be in agreement. Stopped the coumadin that night and started back as usual the next day. Got the lab results back yesterday and the INR by lab testing was 3.8. Makes me wonder if the home testers are off, but I'm starting to think that the lab results may be off more than we think with transport time in a hot courier vehicle, the skill and care of the busy lab techs, time just sitting in the tube, etc. If I calibrate 3 clocks and one is later off, even if its a bigger fancy clock, I would be hard pressed to rely on it. As a physician myself, I always relied on the labs as the gold standard; I've been rethinking alot of stuff I've taken for granted since the heart surgery.
Hey Al, what's your take?
Hey Al, what's your take?