I agree, I don't think we'll ever not have to take anticoagulants. The outcome of the ON-X clinical trials in the US will determine if we ON-X valvers can maintain a lower INR (under 2) without risk of clots/stroke. This is what I am waiting/hoping for.
You know, right after surgery (and before afib) my surgeon set an INR target for me of 1.5-2 (with a daily 325mg aspirin) because I had an ON-X valve.
I was thrilled . . until I tried to manage this. I now have an INR target of 2-3 and it is sooooo much easier to maintain. I don't know that I would ever even try again to maintain that tight and low of an INR window, even if I had the option.
Plumber1- Good luck--wishing you the best outcome possible. You are obviously a survivor!
Last edited: