I'm starting the process of choosing my valve surgeon. I have discussed it with my cardio and he gave me several recommendations. I did the research, and all of his recommendations are highly regarded valve surgeons.
I know I do not have time to interview all of the really good surgeons in Chicago, so I am trying to narrow it down to two. I have spoken with the office staff and nurses of three of his top picks.
Of the three, two staff groups gave the impression of being warm, communicative, easy to reach and very well informed/educated on the specifics of aortic stenosis. They seemed to appreciate the fact that I have learned all I can about the contition and treatment options. The third group was difficult to reach, not very cooperative, and told me some things that I know to be untrue (Do they REALLY usually recommend tissue valves for younger patients?).
My inclination is to exclude this third office and concentrate on the two that seem more comfortable to me. Am I being short-sighted in this approach?
I know I do not have time to interview all of the really good surgeons in Chicago, so I am trying to narrow it down to two. I have spoken with the office staff and nurses of three of his top picks.
Of the three, two staff groups gave the impression of being warm, communicative, easy to reach and very well informed/educated on the specifics of aortic stenosis. They seemed to appreciate the fact that I have learned all I can about the contition and treatment options. The third group was difficult to reach, not very cooperative, and told me some things that I know to be untrue (Do they REALLY usually recommend tissue valves for younger patients?).
My inclination is to exclude this third office and concentrate on the two that seem more comfortable to me. Am I being short-sighted in this approach?