L
Lisa in Katy
My latest and greatest grammar pet peeve is when people use the word "of" when they mean "have". For instance, "I should of stayed in bed." I know this stems from the contraction, "I should've stayed in bed." but that comes from, "I should have stayed in bed." There is no OF in that sentence!
It seems like I see this more and more lately. I think the reason that it annoys me so much is because I once had a student turn in an incomplete math paper with lots of artwork in the margins. Beside the 30 that she earned for the paper, I wrote, "Spend more time on this (with an arrow pointing at the math) and less time on this (with an arrow pointing at the art)." Her mother, who was always rude and obnoxious, returned the paper with a note that said, "If you would of taught her, she could of finished the paper." Of course, it didn't matter that everyone else in the class made a grade between 85-100, it was my fault. So now when I see the word "of" used for the word "have" it brings back that bad memory.
Thanks for listening, now carry on!
It seems like I see this more and more lately. I think the reason that it annoys me so much is because I once had a student turn in an incomplete math paper with lots of artwork in the margins. Beside the 30 that she earned for the paper, I wrote, "Spend more time on this (with an arrow pointing at the math) and less time on this (with an arrow pointing at the art)." Her mother, who was always rude and obnoxious, returned the paper with a note that said, "If you would of taught her, she could of finished the paper." Of course, it didn't matter that everyone else in the class made a grade between 85-100, it was my fault. So now when I see the word "of" used for the word "have" it brings back that bad memory.
Thanks for listening, now carry on!