The Cost of Doing Business

Valve Replacement Forums

Help Support Valve Replacement Forums:

Croooser

VR.org Supporter
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2021
Messages
115
Chuck

Interesting graph. I had a cardiologist show me a similar graph many years ago. Difference was he did not have an age tied to the "cliff" but did have it related to mild to moderate to severe as measured by test results. I think that the idea was that you can be asymptomatic (as I was at the time) and still be at serious risk. Same Dr. Showed me another graph that referenced the risk of surgery vs the risk of waiting until symptoms/test results say severe.

Those were the AHA moments for me when I went from anxiety to cautious optimism.

I hit the "cliff" at age 71 and had a successful surgery.
 

vitdoc

VR.org Supporter
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
345
Location
Southern Ca.
I agree science based but not a true science where the scientific method fully applies. We are not working in a vacuum without any scientific base but we are making decisions based on statistics and experience. Physics, chemistry and even biology are more rigorous. Believe me not going the prayer route.
 

pellicle

Professional Dingbat, Guru and Merkintologist
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2012
Messages
11,507
Location
Queensland, OzTrayLeeYa
I agree science based but not a true science where the scientific method fully applies.
good examples to support this start with the resistance to "evidence based practice" as well as many anecdotes on best practice.

An interesting bit of history which I picked up in my studies at Uni in the 80's presented to demonstrate how long it takes clinical practice to change (back then), partly due to dissemination of information, partly due to resistance by practitioners


IIRC in the American Civil war this practice was not yet in practice there, where sadly they usually went straight to amputation.

 
Top