D
DaveL
Hi everyone. I am a 39 year old male with a moderately regurgitant aortic valve (aortic insufficiency). Surgery is not imminent but may very well be sooner than later (echos every six months).
I was recently turned over to a cardiologist by my family doctor on the basis that my echos seemed to be reporting deterioration of the valve. I'm one of those people who doesn't go to the doctor often (*prefers never*) so of course there were some other things to address. My blood pressure, since childhood, has always been on the high side (150/80) and I had always had a murmer which I didn't have diagnosed as the above until three years ago. Currently my blood pressure has gone quite high 175/96 and I finally succumbed to medication. Which brings me to my point of posting (other than of course to just say "hi, what a nice forum you have here" .
The cardiologist prescribed ProcardiaXL at 60mg/day. I have been reading some extremely conflicting opinions on this medication. There are those (and they are highly accredited) who believe this is not the medication of first choice in lowering high blood pressure. Further, they mention studies showing an increase in rates of heart attack on this medication (and yes, they are referring to the long-acting form of nifedilin and not just the short acting form that is almost totally out of use now).
My question is this. Did my doctor prescribe this medication as much to reduce the "afterload" of my heart (which supposedly Procardia does) as to lower my blood pressure also? If not so, would I likely get the same benefits from a standard diueretic or ace inhibitor without the possible complications that Procardia is increasingly being accused of causing?
Any opinions (and yes, I will take them just as that and not doing anything rash without of course talking to the doc) would be greatly appreciated.
Best Wishes,
David
I was recently turned over to a cardiologist by my family doctor on the basis that my echos seemed to be reporting deterioration of the valve. I'm one of those people who doesn't go to the doctor often (*prefers never*) so of course there were some other things to address. My blood pressure, since childhood, has always been on the high side (150/80) and I had always had a murmer which I didn't have diagnosed as the above until three years ago. Currently my blood pressure has gone quite high 175/96 and I finally succumbed to medication. Which brings me to my point of posting (other than of course to just say "hi, what a nice forum you have here" .
The cardiologist prescribed ProcardiaXL at 60mg/day. I have been reading some extremely conflicting opinions on this medication. There are those (and they are highly accredited) who believe this is not the medication of first choice in lowering high blood pressure. Further, they mention studies showing an increase in rates of heart attack on this medication (and yes, they are referring to the long-acting form of nifedilin and not just the short acting form that is almost totally out of use now).
My question is this. Did my doctor prescribe this medication as much to reduce the "afterload" of my heart (which supposedly Procardia does) as to lower my blood pressure also? If not so, would I likely get the same benefits from a standard diueretic or ace inhibitor without the possible complications that Procardia is increasingly being accused of causing?
Any opinions (and yes, I will take them just as that and not doing anything rash without of course talking to the doc) would be greatly appreciated.
Best Wishes,
David