When I talked to the first surgeon he explained the the TAVR procedure could be performed up to three times, after that they would have to go in and remove them and "It's a bear of a job" he said. Considering my age and the supposed life of the valve It just doesn't seem like a good way to go.
I think that you are wise to avoid TAVR at your age. From your consult, the plan sounds like it would be TAVR in TAVR when your first TAVR undergoes SVD. There is very little data on TAVR in TAVR and from what studies have been done, the hemodynamics are unfavorable and other serious issues. See publication linked below:
"The results of Hatoum and colleagues are certainly compelling in suggesting that certain TAVR-in-TAVR prosthetic combinations are associated with unfavorable hemodynamics, poor leaflet mobility, blood clotting cascade activation, and potentially quicker prosthetic valve degeneration."
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) prostheses' durability is a very legitimate issue, and it is increasingly being studied in a prospective fashion.1,2 It is clear that durability of TAVR prostheses is less of a concern in elderly patients, patients who are not operative candidates...
www.jtcvs.org
So, that is not a spot you want to be in at a relatively young age. If someone is 85 years old, gets a TAVR to avoid OHS then let's say that TAVR lasts them 8 years. So, maybe this would be a good candidate for TAVR in TAVR to give him a few more years and avoid a risky OHS. But, not someone your age to consider in my view.
As to him telling you that you can do a TAVR 3x? So TAVR in TAVR in TAVR? I am almost certain that he is miskaken about this. It's a moot point for you, as you're not going that route, but anyone who is told they can do TAVR 3x in the same valve needs to get another opinion about that. I had the TAVR discussion with my team not too long ago and TAVR in TAVR is a thing, but not TAVR in TAVR in TAVR.